Innovative Business Models in the Tennis Industry: A Literature Review

Authors

  • Hikmad Hakim Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Muhammad Ishak Universitas Negeri Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35458/jc.v6i2.4796

Keywords:

Business Model; Innovation; Tennis; Sports Digitalization; Sports Club Management.

Abstract

This study aims to analyze innovative business models in the tennis industry through a literature review of 25 articles published between 2015 and 2025. The research method uses a literature review approach with a search process through international and national databases such as Scopus, Google Scholar, Web of Science, DOAJ, SINTA, and Garuda. Studies that meet the criteria are analyzed using thematic analysis and narrative synthesis techniques, supported by descriptive statistics to see the trends of the findings. The results of the study indicate six main themes that dominate the development of tennis business models, namely: business model innovation, digitalization and technology utilization, service design and customer experience, revenue diversification, governance and management, and global trends in the sports industry. Quantitative analysis of 10 studies shows that the implementation of innovation has a significant impact on tennis club performance, including an increase in revenue of 44.8%, an increase in the number of new members of 40.5%, an increase in member retention of 27.4%, and an increase in customer satisfaction of 37.5%. These findings confirm that transforming a business model from a traditional approach to a digital-based model, with value-added services, and a sport-lifestyle strategy is a strategic step to increase the competitiveness and sustainability of tennis clubs in the modern sports industry. Therefore, this research contributes to the development of sports management theory and serves as a practical reference for managers and stakeholders in designing an adaptive, innovative, and sustainable tennis business model

References

Aromataris, E., & Pearson, A. (2019). The systematic review: An overview. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 7(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. (2021). Introduction to meta-analysis (2nd ed.). Wiley.
Dai, L., & Yang, J. (2023). A management model to operate a commercial tennis club in Zhanjiang, China. International Journal of Sports and Social Research, 8(2), 45–57. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374193670
García-Pascual, F., & Torres, L. (2025). Tennis club governance: An international comparison across Southern Europe. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 7, 1701253. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2025.1701253
Iturriaga, F., & González, M. (2022). The governance of tennis clubs: Relevant issues in organizational management. ITF Coaching & Sport Science Review, 30(87), 7–12. https://itfcoachingreview.com/index.php/journal/article/view/346
Junaidi, A., & Firmansyah, W. (2019). Industri olahraga: Struktur, perkembangan, dan tantangan modern. Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan Indonesia, 3(2), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.31258/jiki.3.2.115
Lakens, D. (2017). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47(6), 688–697. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.233
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Paul, J., & Criado, A. (2020). The art of writing literature reviews: What do we know and what do we need to know? International Business Review, 29(4), 101717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101717
Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., & Arai, L. (2020). Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. ESRC Methods Programme.
Ratten, V. (2020). Coronavirus and sport entrepreneurship: Implications for sports events and tourism. International Journal of Event and Festival Management, 11(3), 315–321. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEFM-03-2020-0010
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Sun, X., Li, Q., & Chen, Y. (2024). Challenges and scenarios for organizations offering tennis training programs. Journal of Futures Studies, 28(4), 87–102. https://jfsdigital.org/articles-and-essays/2024-2/vol-28-no-4-june-2024
Tranos, A., & Ioannides, M. (2019). Digital transformation in sport organizations: Role of technology in business model innovation. Sport Management Review, 22(3), 389–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2018.05.003
Tou, Y., & Hwang, S. (2024). Digital business models in sport: Technological foundations and industry applications. In D. P. Ratten (Ed.), Sports Management and Digital Innovation (pp. 55–78). Routledge. https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/5fa65029
USTA. (2022). Tennis business development: Strategic guidelines for clubs and academies. United States Tennis Association. https://www.usta.com
Winarno, M. E., & Rachman, R. (2020). Pemasaran olahraga di era digital: Analisis strategi dan implementasi. Jurnal Manajemen Olahraga, 10(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.24036/jmo.v10i1.237
Zhang, T., & Liu, Y. (2021). Service quality, member satisfaction, and loyalty in tennis clubs: An integrated model. Asia Pacific Journal of Sport Management, 5(2), 120–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/174795412098

Downloads

Published

2025-06-21

How to Cite

Hakim, H., & Ishak, M. (2025). Innovative Business Models in the Tennis Industry: A Literature Review. Journal of Sport Education, Coaching, and Health (JOCCA), 6(2), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.35458/jc.v6i2.4796

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >>