Health-Based Physical Education Learning Model: A Literature Review of Global Practices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35458/jc.v6i1.4580Keywords:
Health-Based Physical Education; Global Practices; Physical Activity; Student Health; Curriculum InnovationAbstract
This systematic literature review explores global practices in implementing Health-Based Physical Education (HBPE) models, aiming to identify key strategies, outcomes, and contextual factors influencing success. Using databases such as Scopus, PubMed, ERIC, ScienceDirect, and SINTA, 62 peer-reviewed articles published between 2014 and 2024 were analyzed through thematic synthesis. The review categorizes HBPE models into thematic health-oriented learning, structured physical activity programs (e.g., TPSR, SEPEP), and technology-assisted models (e.g., wearable fitness devices, digital PE platforms). Findings show that HBPE significantly contributes to improving students’ physical health and behavioral outcomes. For example, a controlled study in Canada demonstrated a 23% improvement in cardiorespiratory fitness after a 12-week HBPE intervention (Thomas et al., 2021). In South Korea, schools implementing HBPE integrated with mindfulness training reported reduced stress levels and improved classroom behavior (Lee & Kim, 2020). Across regions, success factors included teacher professional development, supportive national policies, availability of facilities, and cultural alignment of curricula. However, challenges persist, such as inconsistent funding, limited teacher expertise, and socio-cultural barriers in low- and middle-income countries. The review concludes that HBPE is a globally viable model for promoting lifelong health in students, particularly when contextualized to local educational frameworks. Recommendations include investing in teacher training, curriculum innovation, and multi-sector collaboration. This review provides policymakers, educators, and researchers with a comprehensive understanding of global HBPE practices and their relevance to improving the quality and inclusivity of physical education
References
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2019). Physical Education Curriculum Analysis Tool (PECAT). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Hardman, K., & Green, K. (2011). Contemporary issues in physical education: International perspectives. Meyer & Meyer Verlag.
Kahan, D. (2008). Recess, extracurricular activities, and active classroom instruction: Means for increasing elementary school students' physical activity. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 27(3), 281-299.
Lee, M., Cheung, P., & Kwok, S. (2003). The effectiveness of the Trim and Fit Programme in reducing childhood obesity. Singapore Medical Journal, 44(12), 602-606.
Lonsdale, C., Rosenkranz, R. R., Peralta, L. R., Bennie, A., Fahey, P., & Lubans, D. R. (2013). A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions designed to increase moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in school physical education lessons. Preventive Medicine, 56(2), 152-161.
McKenzie, T. L., & Lounsbery, M. A. F. (2009). School physical education: The pill not taken. American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, 3(3), 219-225.
Öhman, M., Almqvist, J., Meckbach, J., & Quennerstedt, M. (2014). Competing for ideal bodies: A study of exergames used as teaching aids in schools. Critical Public Health, 24(2), 196–209.
Sallis, R., Franklin, B., Joy, L., Ross, R., Sabgir, D., & Stone, J. (2016). Strategies for promoting physical activity in clinical practice. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 59(5), 455-462.
Staiano, A. E., & Calvert, S. L. (2011). Exergames for physical education courses: Physical, social, and cognitive benefits. Child Development Perspectives, 5(2), 93-98.
Wang, L., & Chen, P. (2020). Traditional Chinese physical activities and their implications for promoting physical activity in schools. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 20(1), 1-6.
World Health Organization. (2018). Global action plan on physical activity 2018–2030: More active people for a healthier world.






